OFFLOAD builds ranked, evidenced buyer shortlists for the players you need to move — with the why, the wage math and the foreign-quota reality for every club on the list. One player, one window, one print-grade dossier.
On 1 July 2026 — days before Beşiktaş agreed a €20m deal with Arsenal — we ran Leandro Trossard through the OFFLOAD engine using only pre-transfer data. It scored Beşiktaş #1 of all 48 clubs in scope, on signals anyone can check: a left-wing gap, big-club status fit, and money that works. The engine had no knowledge of the deal. It just read the market.
| Rank | Club | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beşiktaş — the actual buyer | 73.0 |
| 2 | Zenit St. Petersburg | 65.5 |
| 3 | Olympiacos | 62.0 |
| 4 | Fenerbahçe | 57.5 |
Who needs to move, what the club actually wants from the exit — raise a fee, clear the wage bill, or free a quota slot — and the real wage. That last input is the one nobody else uses, and it changes everything.
Squad gaps and ageing starters at the position. Unreplaced departures this window. Budget and wage-band fit with a leverage model built on contract runway and age. Foreign-quota rules, verified league by league. Homecoming and career-ladder logic.
Two tiers of clubs, each with a one-line reason a sporting director can test in ten seconds. Print-grade A4, ready for the meeting, the agent call, or the WhatsApp forward.
No black boxes. Every club on the shortlist carries its evidence:
“Only 1 senior player at LW; first-choice is 32; right-sized move for their squad profile.” “Lost their starting CF this window — 31 apps, 14 goals last season — not replaced.” “One foreign slot left (13/14) — move fast or wait for their exits.”Expected next wage modelled from the real wage, contract runway and age — so the shortlist only contains clubs that can actually pay.
Who each shortlisted club just lost at the position — with real numbers — plus an advisory analyst briefing covering adaptation, language and homecoming angles. Advisory means advisory: the ranking is deterministic and re-runnable; the commentary never touches the scores.
The exact dossier the engine produced in the blind back-test — shortlist, why-lines, quota flags, wage math. Leave your details and it opens immediately.
Twenty-five founder seats, priced on a ladder that rises as they fill: seats 1–5 at £15,000 · 6–15 at £25,000 · 16–25 at £35,000 — a one-off fee for a 36-month unlimited term, then a 50% discount for life. Even the last seat is under the list price of four dossiers a year. One seat per organisation, signed founder agreement, hard confidentiality clauses. Every seat sold makes the next one dearer.
Relegation, quota pressure, a wage bill that has to shrink before the window shuts. You know who has to leave; OFFLOAD tells you who realistically takes them, why, and in what order to make the calls. Done-for-you, not another platform your back office has to learn.
You hold the live intel data can't see. OFFLOAD gives you the evidenced case for every door you knock on — squad gap, quota slot, wage fit — so the pitch lands as judgement, not hope. Your client moves somewhere good, and you got him there first.
List a player on a marketplace and the whole market knows you're selling — and prices your distress accordingly. OFFLOAD is built the other way round.
Wages, mandates and target lists are used solely to build your dossiers. Never published, never resold, never reused in another client's work. Confidentiality on club-privileged data survives the engagement — indefinitely.
Nothing is listed, shopped or broadcast. Commissioning OFFLOAD tells the market nothing, because the market never sees it. Your dossier is released to you and no one else.
Every purchased engagement runs under a signed agreement with hard confidentiality clauses — both directions. Read the commitments before you share a single number: terms & confidentiality.
The same engine, pointed the other way. Tell us the gap — position, budget, wage room — and it reads the market for you: who is realistically gettable, what they cost against your quota and wage reality, and why each one fits. Incoming is the bigger decision; make it with the same evidence.
OFFLOAD is currently running a six-player exit mandate for a top-flight club — live, this window.
The engine ranked Beşiktaş first of 48 clubs for Leandro Trossard, three days before the €20m deal was announced.
Three things: the player, the mandate (raise a fee / clear the books / free the slot), and the real wage. Everything else we source. Club-privileged inputs stay confidential — they shape the model and never appear in any output you don't approve.
Public-record sources for squads, contracts, market values and transfer history; league rules verified against current-season primary sources; performance data from established public providers. Your wage and mandate inputs are the private layer that makes the output yours.
No. The ranking is a deterministic model — same inputs, same output, every run, and we can show the working for every score. An analyst layer adds advisory context (adaptation, language, homecoming), clearly labelled, and it never touches the ranking.
Yes — any language, at no extra cost. A shortlist reads differently when your sporting director, your board and the counterparty all read it natively; tell us the language when you brief the player.
Days, not weeks — and faster inside a live mandate where the market cache is already warm. Windows don't wait; neither do we.
Those are platforms your staff operate — subscriptions, logins, network effects. OFFLOAD is done-for-you judgement on a per-player basis: you brief us, you get a decision-ready dossier. No seat licences, no ramp-up, no membership.
Send the player and the mandate. We'll come back with scope and timing the same day.
Email the desk ↗